They might want to be careful asking the neighbors for some sugar on this Encino block.
A 16,553-square-foot, four-bedroom house on Encino’s Weddington Street worth $6 million has been leased by OnlyFans company Creators Inc, and is the center of an all-mighty drama.
Neighbors are fuming that the home is being used to film racy adult content.
They are upset at everything from the “CI” sign on the home to the branded billboard outside — and the fact their sons don’t mind inviting their buddies over to watch the show.
Locals claim a parade of scantily clad women drift in and out of the home, with some lounging on the front lawn and by the pool wearing only pasties to cover their nudity.
A neighbor even filmed a blond woman wearing only a red bikini leave the property with a microphone to be filmed on the street by a cameraman wearing a Creators Inc T-shirt.
The Post has not confirmed if the woman is an OnlyFans creator or influencer.
But the neighbor said filming eventually moved behind the gates after residents complained.
One denied the “morality’’ of the antics going on behind the gates was the issue; rather it was an issue of “zoning, safety and the constant disruption of a residential block.”
“The core issue is that there is a commercial business operating in the middle of a residential neighborhood.’’
They say the house, which had been used for the purpose since 2020, is a revolving door of influencers filming content. They say the filming spills on the streets, in full view of younger residents.
“We have people filming in revealing clothing, vaping outside, and a constant stream of strangers coming through the neighborhood,” one said.
The mansion, near the Armenian Holy Martyrs Ferrahian Church and high school, has become a suburban nightmare.
“They were doing a lot of shoots in the front of the property with girls wearing G-strings and very little clothing,” a neighbor said. “I don’t have any issue with women doing what they want to do. That’s not my concern. But this is a family neighborhood.”
She added: “My boys would have friends over and they’d be watching what was happening outside.”
Another concern they have is what the home will do for property values on their once-quiet block.
“They’re making millions of dollars from a property that has negatively affected our neighborhood,” she said. “You have young people who are trying to start some kind of entertainment presence or something. They don’t care about families.
‘’They’re not here to care about my family or my feelings.”
However, in a strongly worded statement to The Post, Creators Inc. disputed allegations of ongoing disruptions or zoning violations at its Los Angeles headquarters, pointing out the company has never been cited and maintains a cooperative relationship with local authorities.
A spokeswoman said people in the neighborhood had been “monitoring, photographing and commenting on women entering the property, including remarks about their appearance and clothing.
“We strongly condemn this behavior and the characterization of our clients,’’ she said.
“We are aware that a small number of individuals have repeatedly raised objections to our operation and to the creator economy industry more broadly.
“It appears that some of the complaints are not based on unlawful conduct or actual neighborhood disruption, but rather a disagreement on our operations.’’
The company said the pushback was a disagreement over the creator economy rather than legitimate legal issues, adding that it would take “legal action to protect its reputation against defamatory or misleading claims.’’
Neighbors, meanwhile, claim they have contacted the company, the LAPD, Councilwoman Nithya Raman, and city attorney Todd Gilman about taking action.
One neighbor claims she received a legal threat from Creators Inc when she raised concerns about the goings on.
“Our Encino Property Owners Association helped us get in touch with the city attorney at the time, Todd Gilman. We had several Zoom meetings with him.
“He told us that what was happening violated zoning laws because a commercial business was being operated out of a residential property.
“We were told to file complaints with the city, which we all did. We were repeatedly told that the city simply didn’t have the resources to pursue the matter and that it wasn’t a priority.”
She claims she was later singled out by Creators Inc.’s attorney and threatened with legal action, despite being just one of several residents raising concerns.
Representatives for Gilman, Raman, and the LAPD did not respond to requests for comment from The Post.
Read the full article here
