The AI debate has developed a strange pattern.
An AI model produces unexpected or potentially scary results, someone predicts the end of humanity, and the conversation jumps straight to whether civilization has only a few years left. Missing somewhere between the demonstration and the obituary is the evidence. We should demand it.
Claims that AI will destroy humanity require a credible explanation of how software could acquire the power to overcome human resistance in the physical world. An alarming prediction, even from an accomplished researcher, doesn’t settle that question.
Longtime technology analysts should lead this discussion. Too…
Read the full article at TECHNEWSWORLD.COM
